台灣應該趁勢廢除國統會以及國統綱領

(2006/02/06 00:05)

(●作者YUIO為北市人，大學畢，為業餘軍事武器研究者。本文為網友投稿，言論不代表本報立場。●照片為本報資料照。※YUIO特區)

yuio

陳水扁總統在大年初一對外表示認真考慮廢除國統會以及以台灣名義申請加入聯合國，事後美國國務院也就他的談話作出回應，可是台灣一些媒體又基於本身的意識型態硬是將美國政府的部分談話加以扭曲並妄加評論，實在是既可憐又可悲。

如果從美國政府反對台灣或是中國片改變現狀的回應看來，基本上美國是不反對廢除國統會以及國統綱領，因為國統會的目的就是追求統一，將會破壞不統不獨的現狀，所以當美國國務院發言人被問及廢除國統會是否違反四不一沒有的承諾時，該發言人也只是語帶保留的說美國反對台灣與中國片面改變現狀，而不敢正面批評陳水扁總統不守信諾。

因為對美國而言「現在台獨」(擔心引起戰爭)和「未來統一」(怕會傷害美國全球霸權利益)都不符合美國的利益，故就算是陳水扁總統不守信諾(事實上所謂的四不一沒有是有前提的)只要符合美國的利益，美國當然是樂觀其成；因此美國國務院的回應等於是在告訴外界：台灣廢除國統會放棄統一沒有關係，只是前提是不能進一步追求台灣現在獨立。

至於以台灣名義申請加入聯合國則恐有變更國號之虞，所以美國才會直接了當的指出那是片面改變現狀的做法。

國統會以及國統綱領的存在其實早已沒有任何意義了，因為那是國民黨一黨專政下的產物，再者基於主權在民的原則台灣未來究竟是要統、要獨、或是要永遠維持不統不獨的現狀也必須以公民投票的方式加以決定；只有台灣內部少數死守統一神主牌的人以及長期遭到國民黨洗腦的統派媒體才會將陳水扁總統認真考慮廢除國統會和國統綱領當作是生死存亡大事來看待，並且歇斯底里的叫囂瘋狂反對！

附註：以下是美國國務院有關陳水扁總統談話的相關回應，一開始就強調美國政府是老調重談，什麼美國給陳水扁當頭棒喝的說法都是胡扯，只有統派媒體才會自我欺騙的說美國強烈反對廢除國統綱領以及國統會。

1:13 p.m. EST

MR. ERELI: Welcome, everybody. Pleasure to have you with us. I've got three statements to start off with. One we issued yesterday, but I wanted to draw your attention to it. It's from the Secretary congratulating Shaykh Sabah Al-Ahmed Al-Jaber Al Sabah who was approved yesterday by the -- Kuwait's parliament as the Amir of Kuwait. The Secretary had the pleasure of meeting Shaykh Sabah in Washington this summer and we also make note of the Kuwaiti Government's commitment to the constitution during this transition process and their respect for the rule of law in managing the transition.

A second statement we put out today is also by the Secretary welcoming the news that Father Gerald Jean Juste has been released from prison in Haiti and is now in the United States. We had long called for his humanitarian release from prison so that he could get medical treatment. It was the subject of sustained efforts by many American officials and we applaud the humanitarian decision by the Interim Government of Haiti to allow Father Jean Juste to seek medical attention.

The final statement is just a reiteration of U.S. policy on Taiwan. We are pointing out, once again, that our -- the U.S. policy towards Taiwan is governed by our "one China" policy, the Taiwan Relations Act and the three U.S.-China joint communiqu, and we urge both Beijing and Taipei to establish substantive -strait dialogue to the mutual benefit of both sides on the strait.

QUESTION: Are you issuing this to celebrate China𠏋 New Years or is there a reason?

MR. ERELI: No. We're issuing this in the wake of some comments by President Chen in Taiwan that we don't want to be inflammatory or send the wrong signal, so we thought it useful to reiterate U.S. policy on the subject.

QUESTION: What do you think of his move to abolish the unification panel that was set up?

MR. ERELI: Well, as I said, there were some remarks made over the weekend that are just that, remarks. As far as U.S. is concerned -- United States is concerned, our policy towards this issue hasn't changed. We think it's important that both sides engage in dialogue and that there be -- and very importantly, I think it's -- I want to underscore this -- the United States opposes any unilateral change to the status quo by either side.

Yeah.

QUESTION: Adam?

QUESTION: On Taiwan, too. The -- President Chen also mentioned that he would like to promote Taiwan's participation in the United Nations, especially in the name of Taiwan. I'm just wondering what's the U.S. stand on that issue.

MR. ERELI: I think if you look at the broad principles of our policy, you'll see that we don't -- we oppose, as I just said, any unilateral change to the status quo, and that would govern that issue as well.

●東森論壇徵稿區→http://www.nownews.com/write/

(●作者YUIO為北市人，大學畢，為業餘軍事武器研究者。本文為網友投稿，言論不代表本報立場。●照片為本報資料照。※YUIO特區)